Nakamoto BTC treasury losses deepen after peak Bitcoin buys, partial sales, and a steep NAKA stock drawdown versus Strategy and Metaplanet.
Author: Kritika Gupta
29th May 2026– Nakamoto BTC treasury losses are back in focus after Arkham Intelligence highlighted the company’s roughly $224 million unrealized Bitcoin drawdown, making it one of the weakest-performing corporate BTC treasury trades of the current cycle. Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA), led by Bitcoin Magazine CEO David Bailey, accumulated most of its Bitcoin near the 2025 market peak at an average cost basis of around $118,171 per BTC before later selling part of its holdings during the 2026 downturn.
High Signal Summary For A Quick Glance
James Whitfield 📋
@MoatReview
@arkham Nakamoto's BTC position is down 35%. Their equity is down 99.4%. That gap is the cost of leverage, overhead, and market confidence collapsing simultaneously. The treasury strategy didn't fail because BTC fell — it failed because the vehicle built around BTC was never priced for
We found the WORST performing BTC treasury company. Nakamoto bought ~$679 MILLION of BTC at an average price ~$118K - and held it all the way down. They’ve lost about $224 Million in less than a year, selling only 284 BTC at ~$70K 3 months ago. Now, they’re down over 35% on https://t.co/ThgxJURFAs
11:13 AM·May 29, 2026
Athenum Analytics
@athenumxyz
@arkham One footnote on "$1,000 to $5.60": that's split-adjusted. NAKA peaked at $34.77, dropped under $0.20, then ran a 1-for-40 reverse split last week to dodge a Nasdaq delisting. The 99% is real. The framing just hides that it was already a sub-dollar stock, which is arguably
We found the WORST performing BTC treasury company. Nakamoto bought ~$679 MILLION of BTC at an average price ~$118K - and held it all the way down. They’ve lost about $224 Million in less than a year, selling only 284 BTC at ~$70K 3 months ago. Now, they’re down over 35% on https://t.co/ThgxJURFAs
11:12 AM·May 29, 2026
Macro Alpha
@MacroAlphaHQ
@arkham Spot BTC has never crossed 74k. If that cost basis is real, they bought a closed-end trust at a massive premium and held it while the arb collapsed to NAV. Just gross negligence
We found the WORST performing BTC treasury company. Nakamoto bought ~$679 MILLION of BTC at an average price ~$118K - and held it all the way down. They’ve lost about $224 Million in less than a year, selling only 284 BTC at ~$70K 3 months ago. Now, they’re down over 35% on https://t.co/ThgxJURFAs
11:00 AM·May 29, 2026
Steady attention without excessive speculation.
Nakamoto Inc. traces its origins to Nakamoto Holdings, a company David Bailey founded in 2025. Bailey also leads BTC Inc., which publishes Bitcoin Magazine. He also oversees UTXO Management, a Bitcoin-focused asset management arm.
The company went public through a merger with healthcare firm KindlyMD. That deal, announced in May 2025, gave Nakamoto a NASDAQ listing and capital market access.
On or around August 19, 2025, Nakamoto acquired 5,744 BTC. The cumulative cost reached roughly $681.25 million. That brought total holdings to 5,765 BTC, including small prior amounts. The average cost basis landed at approximately $118,171 per BTC, near the cycle peak.
Bailey described the vision as “Strategy, squared.” The phrase referenced Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy). Nakamoto’s pitch went beyond passive Bitcoin holding. The company aimed to combine media, asset management, and advisory into one Bitcoin-native conglomerate.
Arkham’s tweet stated plainly: “We found the WORST performing BTC treasury company.” The firm’s entity dashboard tracks Nakamoto’s labeled wallets. It shows large inflows matching the August 2025 purchase window.
The dashboard also reveals an outflow of approximately 284 BTC around March 2026. According to bitcointreasuries.net, holdings dropped from 5,765 BTC to 5,058 BTC by March 30, 2026. The sale price was approximately $70,000 per BTC. That locked in a realized loss of roughly $48,000 per coin.
As of March 30, the remaining 5,058 BTC were worth approximately $371.3 million. That implies a BTC price around $73,400. The gap between cost basis and current value accounts for the roughly $224 million in unrealized losses.
NAKA stock has suffered a near-total wipeout. Shares traded around $5.40 to $5.60 in late May 2026. That is down from nominal peaks above $1,000, adjusted for reverse split considerations. The decline is approximately 99.4%, according to market data.
The company’s Q1 2026 results, filed with the SEC, showed large mark-to-market losses. Under current fair value accounting rules, unrealized crypto losses flow directly into earnings.
The 52-week low for NAKA hit approximately $4.50. Lockup expirations and dilution concerns added further selling pressure beyond the BTC-driven losses.
Nakamoto’s performance stands in stark contrast to other Bitcoin treasury companies. Japan’s Metaplanet (ticker 3350) became a top performer. It achieved this through earlier and more disciplined accumulation. Semler Scientific (SMLR) also adopted the model without the same drawdown.
Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy, MSTR) is the original corporate Bitcoin accumulator. It holds over 200,000 BTC with an average cost basis far below Nakamoto’s. The key difference is timing. Strategy started buying in 2020 at much lower prices.
The 2025 wave of corporate BTC adoption brought dozens of new treasury companies to public markets. Many saw compressed mNAV ratios as BTC pulled back from its highs. mNAV measures the gap between market value and net asset value. Nakamoto’s situation is the most extreme because of its concentrated purchase near the cycle top.
Nakamoto vs. major Bitcoin treasury peers
Defenders of Nakamoto argue the losses are unrealized. They say the losses become irrelevant if Bitcoin recovers to $118,000 or above. Bailey has signaled confidence through recent insider purchases of NAKA shares.
The company also holds non-treasury assets that Arkham’s analysis does not capture. BTC Inc. and UTXO Management generate revenue independent of BTC price movements. Supporters argue these verticals have real value.
Bailey stated: “Our total focus is on increasing the bitcoin per share.” That framing treats the current drawdown as a temporary paper loss. It positions the strategy as a long-term accumulation play.
Others note that the broader BTC treasury sector experienced mNAV compression. That makes Nakamoto’s decline partly a sector-wide phenomenon, not an isolated failure.
On X, the Arkham post drew sharp reactions. Commenters posted memes about poor timing. Some urged the company to “sell the rest.” The dominant sentiment was negative.
Some defenders pushed back. They pointed to Bailey’s insider buying as a conviction signal. They also argued that dilution and lockup expirations played a larger role than BTC price alone.
Crypto forums on Reddit amplified the criticism of Nakamoto’s execution. The emerging narrative frames the company as a cautionary tale of peak buying. A minority view sees current levels as a potential contrarian entry point.
Several key questions remain unanswered. The precise reason for the March 2026 sale of 284 BTC has not been publicly disclosed. Possible explanations include margin calls, debt covenants, or operational cash needs.
Nakamoto has not issued a formal response to Arkham’s tweet as of May 29. The company’s full debt and covenant status is not entirely clear from public filings. Plans for further BTC accumulation have not been updated.
Nakamoto needs BTC to recover above $118,000 to break even on its treasury position. Until then, the company faces continued mark-to-market pressure on its balance sheet.
Whether Nakamoto becomes a cautionary tale or a vindicated long-term bet depends on where Bitcoin goes from here. For now, Arkham’s on-chain data tells a blunt story. The worst-performing Nakamoto BTC treasury company bought $679 million at the top.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk.
Our Crypto Talk is committed to unbiased, transparent, and true reporting to the best of our knowledge. This news article aims to provide accurate information in a timely manner. However, we advise the readers to verify facts independently and consult a professional before making any decisions based on the content since our sources could be wrong too. Check our Terms and conditions for more info.
Bitcoin
