
BitMine ETH buy saw 75,000 ETH withdrawn from Kraken and FalconX as Tom Lee-linked accumulation drew on-chain attention.
Author: Kritika Gupta
10th June 2026- Three whale addresses pulled roughly 75,000 ETH off Kraken and FalconX on June 9 and 10, 2026. The haul was worth about $123M. On-chain firm Arkham flagged the cluster, and several trackers tied the BitMine ETH buy to Tom Lee.
High Signal Summary For A Quick Glance
i5labs
@ifivelabs
@arkham Whales don't always catch the exact bottom, but they rarely buy this size without conviction. Could be the start of reducing the current selling pressure on ETH.
THESE 3 WHALES JUST BOUGHT $100M OF ETH 3 whale addresses (2 of these being fresh addresses) just withdrew a total of $122.29M ETH from FalconX and Kraken. The address that bought ETH previously, is currently down $9.1M on its past buy. Is this Tom Lee? https://t.co/FaqtTagpJF
07:48 AM·Jun 10, 2026
Alex Bayarchyk
@AlexBayarchyk
@arkham $122M of ETH leaving exchanges is the signal. Whether it’s Tom Lee or not is just the headline. The coins are moving into wallets, not sitting on an order book waiting to be sold.
THESE 3 WHALES JUST BOUGHT $100M OF ETH 3 whale addresses (2 of these being fresh addresses) just withdrew a total of $122.29M ETH from FalconX and Kraken. The address that bought ETH previously, is currently down $9.1M on its past buy. Is this Tom Lee? https://t.co/FaqtTagpJF
07:15 AM·Jun 10, 2026
Zeeme ⚡ | On-Chain Research
@0x_zeeme
@arkham No matter whose bought ❌ No matter how much bought ❌ 2021 ETH= 1700$ ✅ 2026 ETH= 1700$ ✅ Nothing Will change...
THESE 3 WHALES JUST BOUGHT $100M OF ETH 3 whale addresses (2 of these being fresh addresses) just withdrew a total of $122.29M ETH from FalconX and Kraken. The address that bought ETH previously, is currently down $9.1M on its past buy. Is this Tom Lee? https://t.co/FaqtTagpJF
06:56 AM·Jun 10, 2026
Steady attention without excessive speculation.
Arkham grouped the three wallets into one entity it labeled “ETH Whales 10/6.” The firm posted the alert at 06:52 UTC on June 10. Notably, it framed the discovery as a question: “Is this Tom Lee?”
The flows arrived in three chunks over about 11 hours. First, around 20,000 ETH, worth about $33.01M, moved from FalconX to one address. Then 30,000 ETH, worth about $48.83M, left Kraken for a second wallet.
Finally, a third address received roughly 25,000 ETH, worth about $40.45M, also from Kraken. Two of the three wallets were brand new, with no prior history. As a result, attribution leaned on timing and clustering rather than a clear paper trail.
According to Arkham, the entity now holds about 90,000 ETH. That stack is worth roughly $146.86M at about $1,631.82 per ETH. Each transfer is verifiable on Etherscan by filtering large inflows from the exchange hot wallets.
Arkham hedged its call, yet other trackers did not. Lookonchain stated plainly that Tom Lee’s BitMine bought another 75,000 ETH from Kraken and FalconX over roughly eight hours.
CryptoBriefing followed with similar reporting on June 10. The outlet framed the BitMine ETH buy as continued treasury accumulation during the dip. So far, neither Tom Lee nor BitMine has publicly confirmed this specific tranche.
Still, the pattern fits. BitMine Immersion Technologies, chaired by Fundstrat’s Tom Lee, has stacked Ethereum aggressively since mid-2025. Earlier, reports cited a roughly $214M buy of about 127,000 ETH that pushed holdings near 5.54M ETH.
The company also models itself on MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin playbook. In short, it raises capital, buys the asset, and stakes much of it for yield. Because of that strategy, large exchange withdrawals from the same venues now read as a familiar BitMine signature.
Timeline — the accumulation sequence
One repeat address previously received 15,000 ETH from FalconX and is now down about $9.1M on that buy.
Three whale addresses receive roughly 75,000 ETH from FalconX and Kraken hot wallets.
A fresh address receives about 25,000 ETH, worth roughly $40.45M, from a Kraken hot wallet.
A second address receives about 30,000 ETH, worth roughly $48.83M, from a Kraken hot wallet.
The repeat whale address receives about 20,000 ETH, worth roughly $33.01M, from FalconX.
Arkham labels the three-wallet cluster as “ETH Whales 10/6” and notes a total withdrawal of about $122.29M in ETH.
On-chain watchers try to confirm whether the wallets belong to Tom Lee-linked BitMine or another large ETH accumulator.
The story is not all green candles. One of the three wallets is not actually fresh. Instead, it received 15,000 ETH from FalconX about three weeks earlier.
That earlier position is now down roughly $9.1M, according to Arkham data. Because of this, the firm’s cautious “Is this Tom Lee?” framing makes sense. After all, a treasury that buys dips will sometimes catch a falling knife.
Meanwhile, the broader BitMine ETH buy continued anyway. ETH traded near $1,618 to $1,650 during the withdrawal window. Tom Lee has repeatedly described such dips as accumulation chances rather than warnings.
Whale address breakdown
Moving coins from an exchange hot wallet to self-custody is a classic accumulation signal. In other words, the buyer is taking supply off the order book. As a result, immediate sell pressure tends to ease.
Hot wallets like those at Kraken and FalconX hold operational liquidity. Therefore, large outflows usually mean the buyer wants cold storage, staking, or a treasury position. This differs sharply from an exchange deposit, which often hints at selling.
The scale matters too. Pulling 75,000 ETH off two major venues trims the liquid sell-side supply on those order books. Reserve trackers such as DefiLlama and CryptoQuant should show that incremental drop over the following days.
Fresh addresses still complicate quick attribution, because they carry no behavioral footprint. To bridge that gap, analytics platforms use clustering heuristics such as shared funding sources and timing. The prior 15,000 ETH buy then helps link the cluster to past activity. You can inspect the second wallet on Etherscan as well.
Reaction on X leaned bullish. Many traders read the flows as a conviction buy rather than a quiet exit. One widely shared reply called 75,000 ETH in eight hours “balance sheet execution, not treasury drift.”
Others kept it lighter. Because one wallet sits down $9.1M, jokes about “Inverse Tom” spread quickly. Still, few accounts seriously disputed the BitMine attribution.
Analysts mostly framed the move as smart money buying while retail stays fearful. For now, no credible alternative theory, such as an ETF rebalance or an unrelated fund, has gained traction. So the dominant read remains steady accumulation into weakness.
For now, the flows point to conviction rather than distribution. Corporate treasuries keep buying while retail sentiment stays cautious. Consequently, watchers will track whether the entity stakes the ETH or adds more.
The next signals to watch are simple. First, look for fresh inflows to the same cluster. Second, watch for any official word from BitMine on its total holdings.
None of this is financial advice. On-chain attribution can shift as more data surfaces, so treat the BitMine link as reported, not confirmed. Readers can verify the wallets themselves on Arkham and Etherscan before drawing conclusions.
Our Crypto Talk is committed to unbiased, transparent, and true reporting to the best of our knowledge. This news article aims to provide accurate information in a timely manner. However, we advise the readers to verify facts independently and consult a professional before making any decisions based on the content since our sources could be wrong too. Check our Terms and conditions for more info.