Michael Saylor Criticizes Onchain Proof-of-Reserves, Citing Security Risks

Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy, is pushing back against the growing trend of onchain proof-of-reserves in the crypto industry. Speaking on May 26 at an event alongside Bitcoin 2025 in Las Vegas, Saylor argued that the practice exposes institutions to unnecessary security risks.

“It’s Not a Good Idea”

When asked if Strategy would publish its own proof-of-reserves, Saylor avoided a direct answer. Instead, he offered a broader critique:

“The current, conventional way to publish proof of reserves is an insecure proof of reserves. It actually dilutes the security of the issuer, the custodians, the exchanges and the investors.”

Saylor argued that making wallet addresses public—even for the sake of transparency—opens a door for cyberattacks. He described it as a “bad idea” from a security perspective, particularly for large institutional holders.

Transparency vs. Exposure

Proof-of-reserves became more common following the collapse of FTX in 2022. The practice aims to show that exchanges and custodians hold enough assets to cover user deposits. Companies like Binance, Kraken, OKX, and Bitwise have since adopted the model.

However, Saylor says proof-of-reserves only shows one side of the equation: what an entity holds, not what it owes. He emphasized that disclosing wallet addresses may help track assets, but it also makes the organization vulnerable to surveillance and targeted attacks.

“Go to AI, put it in deep think mode and then ask it: ‘What are the security problems of publishing your wallet addresses?’ It would write 50 pages of problems,” Saylor said.

Strategy Sticks to Traditional Audits

Instead of publishing onchain data, Strategy prefers external audits. These are done in private by licensed professionals and don’t expose wallet-level data on the blockchain. According to Saylor, this method offers stronger protection without compromising trust.

This view runs counter to many in the crypto community who argue that blockchain-based transparency tools are essential after the industry’s recent failures.