Published On: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 03:44:57 GMT

Buterin and Yakovenko Clash Over Ethereum L2 Security

A public between Vitalik Buterin and Anatoly Yakovenko has reignited discussions around the security of Ethereum’s layer-2 networks.

Sahil Thakur News Altcoin

Oct 27, 2025

Author: Sahil Thakur

27th October 2025 – A public debate between Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has reignited discussions around the security of Ethereum’s layer-2 (L2) networks. Their opposing viewpoints have raised questions about whether L2 solutions genuinely inherit the robust security guarantees of Ethereum’s base layer.

Key Takeaways

Vitalik Buterin defended Ethereum’s L2s, claiming they inherit base layer security and resist 51% attacks.
Buterin also acknowledged risks when validators perform tasks beyond the blockchain’s control.
Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko challenged these assumptions, citing flaws in L2 architecture like multisig custody and centralization.
Yakovenko proposed a new Ethereum-Solana bridge that treats Ethereum as a layer-2 to improve cross-chain asset security.

Buterin: L2s Inherit Base Layer Security

In a recent post on X, Vitalik Buterin defended Ethereum’s L2 security model. He argued that major L2 networks—such as Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Worldchain – derive finality and resistance to 51% attacks directly from Ethereum’s base layer.

“A key property of a blockchain is that even a 51% attack cannot make an invalid block valid,” Buterin wrote. “This means even 51% of validators colluding (or hit by a software bug) cannot steal your assets.”

The Talk

Real voices. Real reactions.

KOLs

Media

Community

🫥 No reactions available in this category.

Mar 23, 2026

Backpack Launches $BP Token on Solana

Mar 23, 2026

Katana Perps Goes Live Signaling DeFi Derivatives Expansion

Mar 23, 2026

MiladyBSC Launches x402 Payment Facilitator On BNB Chain

Mar 23, 2026

edgeX $EDGE Token Launch Set for March 31

Fetching related reads

However, he also pointed out the limits of that security. If validator sets are entrusted with tasks that the chain itself does not control, those guarantees may break down.

“At that point, 51% of validators can collude and give a wrong answer, and you don’t have any recourse,” he added.

Proponents of Ethereum’s L2 architecture highlight the strength of its validator base, which includes over one million active participants, vastly outnumbering Solana’s approximately 2,000 validators. This validator scale, they argue, increases resistance to coordinated attacks.

Tweet not available.

Yakovenko: L2 Security Assumptions Are Flawed

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko directly disputed Buterin’s claims. In his view, the belief that Ethereum L2s inherit full security from the base chain is incorrect.

“The claim that L2s inherit Ethereum security is erroneous,” Yakovenko posted on X. “Five years into the L2 roadmap, wormhole ETH on Solana has the same worst-case risks as ETH on Base – and generates as much revenue for Ethereum L1 stakers.”

Yakovenko questioned whether persistent limitations stem from fundamental issues with L2 design. He dismissed the notion that delays in achieving full security are due to incompetence among L2 teams.

Tweet not available.

He outlined three major vulnerabilities:

Broad Attack Surface: Complex L2 codebases are difficult to audit fully, increasing exposure to exploits.
Multi-Signature Risks: Custody mechanisms can allow funds to move without user consent if signers are compromised.
Centralization Risks: Off-chain processes shift control to a few actors, undermining decentralization.

Buterin Vs Yakovenko

      Disagreements Between Vitalik Buterin (Ethereum) and Anatoly Yakovenko (Solana)
    
Aspect
Yakovenko (Solana)
Buterin (Ethereum)
Philosophy
Criticized Ethereum as a “bourgeois spectacle”, arguing it favors the wealthy and lacks accessibility for ordinary users.
Focuses on inclusive governance, decentralization, and protocol sustainability—even if it means higher costs or slower speeds.
Technology Stack
Prioritizes high throughput, low latency, low-cost transactions on Layer 1 without relying on L2 scaling.
Focuses on Layer 2 scaling solutions (e.g., rollups), even if they rely on partially centralized sequencers.
Validator Participation
Emphasizes broader access and lower requirements for running nodes/validators.
Requires 32 ETH to run a validator; justified as necessary for network security and economic alignment.
Sequencer Debate
Strongly criticizes centralized Layer 2 sequencers, calling them antithetical to crypto’s ideals.
Supports sequencers in L2 systems as a short-term UX improvement, with plans for decentralization over time.
Tone/Public Comments
More openly critical, e.g., “not fighting Ethereum, but fighting its L2s.”
More diplomatic, e.g., praised Solana’s developer community as “earnest” and “smart.”
Broader Implications
Pushes for mass adoption through usability and performance-first design, even with centralization trade-offs.
Values systemic robustness and decentralization, even if at the cost of mass usability in the short-term.

A New Bridge Proposal

To address these concerns, Yakovenko proposed building a dedicated Ethereum-Solana bridge that positions Ethereum as a layer-2 on Solana. He believes such a solution could enable secure asset transfers between the ecosystems while avoiding current L2 shortcomings.

As Ethereum and Solana continue to scale, their respective strategies for decentralization, security, and interoperability are becoming increasingly divergent, setting the stage for ongoing debate within the blockchain community.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Vitalik Buterin claim about Ethereum’s L2 security?

Buterin argues that Ethereum L2s inherit strong security properties from the Ethereum mainnet. He highlights that even a 51% validator attack cannot validate an invalid block, which keeps user assets safe under normal consensus rules.

Why did Anatoly Yakovenko challenge Buterin’s view?

Yakovenko disagreed, asserting that L2s do not automatically inherit Ethereum’s security. He pointed out that despite five years of development, L2s still face technical limits that prevent them from achieving full security parity with Ethereum.

What security risks did Yakovenko identify in L2 networks?

He noted three key concerns: overly complex code bases that are hard to audit, multi-signature custody systems vulnerable to collusion or compromise, and off-chain processing that reduces decentralization and increases attack risk.

What alternative solution did Yakovenko propose?

Yakovenko suggested a bridge that treats Ethereum as an L2 on Solana. His goal is to make cross-chain asset transfers more secure and seamless, without sacrificing decentralization or increasing risk exposure.

Trusted

Our Crypto Talk is committed to unbiased, transparent, and true reporting to the best of our knowledge. This news article aims to provide accurate information in a timely manner. However, we advise the readers to verify facts independently and consult a professional before making any decisions based on the content since our sources could be wrong too. Check our Terms and conditions for more info.

Join Our Telegram Community

NEWS

OPINION/RESEARCH

FEATURES

ABOUT US

Buterin and Yakovenko Clash Over Ethereum L2 Security

Key Takeaways

Buterin: L2s Inherit Base Layer Security

The Talk

Read Other Altcoin articles

Fetching related reads

Yakovenko: L2 Security Assumptions Are Flawed

Buterin Vs Yakovenko

A New Bridge Proposal

Frequently Asked Questions

Trusted

In this article

Related reads

Related reads

Related reads

Related reads

Read Other Altcoin articles